PH Intelligence · Free benchmarks
PH industrial benchmarks and intelligence (free reports from the hive)
Who this is for
- Plant managers benchmarking performance
- Reliability and maintenance engineers
- CFOs and operations directors
- Industry analysts and consultants
- Sector associations (PSME, PIChE, IIEE)
- New graduates researching the market
- OFW-track engineers comparing PH to abroad
What's in this guide
Why PH plants need PH benchmarks
Most industrial KPI benchmarks available to Philippine plants come from North American or European sources (SMRP, ARC, Plant Engineering surveys). The benchmarks are useful but the context is wrong: those plants run with different ambient temperatures, different labor cost structures, different supplier ecosystems, different regulatory regimes, and different power-quality conditions. A "world-class 85 percent OEE" benchmark from a German automotive plant tells a Cabuyao food plant nothing useful about whether their 62 percent is good.
PH-specific benchmarks fix this. When a Pampanga beverage plant sees that the median PH beverage-sector MTTR is 4.2 hours and their MTTR is 5.8 hours, the gap is actionable. When the same plant sees the world-class number is 1.5 hours, the gap is demoralising and unactionable.
What the quarterly reports cover
- OEE by sector: distribution (10th, 50th, 90th percentile) plus median Availability, Performance, Quality breakdown
- MTBF by asset class: rotating equipment, static equipment, instrumentation, electrical
- MTTR by sector and asset class: with diagnosis vs parts-wait vs work-time breakdown
- PM compliance by sector and plant size: distribution and trend over last 4 quarters
- Downtime cost per hour by sector: for use in business cases
- Adoption of digital tools: share of plants on paper, digital logbook, paid CMMS, sensor-based PdM
- Top 10 fault categories per sector: from anonymised logbook data
How anonymity actually works
Anonymity has to be real for plants to participate. Three layers:
- Aggregation threshold. No metric is published for a sector unless at least 8 plants in that sector are contributing data. Below 8, the data is held until the threshold is reached.
- Outlier suppression. The minimum and maximum 5 percent of values are suppressed in each metric to prevent identifying outlier plants by their distinctive numbers.
- No reverse-identification fields. Plant name, location, parent company, and any free-text comments are stripped before aggregation. Only sector, plant size band, and the numeric KPIs flow into the benchmark dataset.
Opt-in participation rules
Participation is opt-in at the hive level (plant manager decides). Plants that opt in get:
- Their own metrics displayed alongside the sector benchmark, so they can see where they stand
- Early access to each quarterly report (1 month before public release)
- Customisable peer cohort (compare against plants of similar size, sector, region)
Plants that do not opt in can still read the public quarterly reports for free. They just do not see how their own metrics compare. This asymmetry encourages participation without penalising non-participation.
How plants use the reports
- Capex justification. "Our MTBF is 600 hours; the median for our sector is 1,400 hours. Closing half the gap to 1,000 hours saves PHP X per year in downtime." This argument lands with finance teams; "world-class is 8,000" does not.
- Vendor negotiation. Showing a supplier that the sector median lead time is 21 days when they are quoting 45 days surfaces a real conversation.
- Internal stretch targets. Setting next year's PM compliance target at "75 percent (current sector P75)" is more credible than "85 percent (world-class)" and more motivating than the current 62 percent.
- Insurance and audit conversations. Showing an insurer that the plant's MTTR is in the top quartile of the sector supports rate negotiation.
Sector coverage roadmap
Initial sector coverage (by participation count threshold):
- Manufacturing (food, electronics, automotive, packaging)
- Power generation (thermal, hydro, geothermal, solar)
- Water and wastewater utilities
- Petrochemicals and refining
- BMS / facilities (commercial buildings, hospitals, malls)
Sub-sector breakdowns appear as participation grows. The first quarterly report typically lands 2 quarters after the platform reaches the 8-plant threshold per sector.
The tool this guide is about
WorkHive PH Intelligence is the free Philippine-specific benchmark
Quarterly reports on OEE, MTBF, MTTR, PM compliance, downtime cost, and digital adoption by sector. Anonymous aggregation with 8-plant minimum threshold and outlier suppression. Free to read for everyone; opt-in participants see their own metrics alongside the benchmark. Built for Philippine plants by the WorkHive hive of hives.
Open PH IntelligenceNo hive yet? Join WorkHive first (free, takes 30 seconds).
Frequently asked questions
Why use PH-specific benchmarks instead of world-class?
How is anonymity enforced?
Do I have to share my data to read the reports?
What sectors are covered?
How often are reports published?
Can I use the data in academic research or industry presentations?
Sources
- Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals (SMRP), Best Practices, 5th Edition. KPI definitions used in the PH benchmark.
- Plant Engineering Magazine, Maintenance Study annual report. Source for global benchmark context.
- Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), industrial sector classification. Used for PH benchmark sector taxonomy.
- WorkHive platform positioning, "Four Gaps One Hive" with PH Intelligence as the Stage 4 industry-leadership tool. workhiveph.com
- Related WorkHive guides: OEE calculation · MTBF vs MTTR